• HOME
  • Bio
  • CLIENT LIST
  • WRITING SAMPLES
  • BLOG
  • CONTACT

Blog

How Much $ is Enough?

5/24/2009

0 Comments

 
The furor over insurance giant AIG’s $165 million in employee bonuses runs deep and is understandable to most average Americans. As someone who has been covering that industry for more than two decades, it’ll be fascinating to see if the company can survive the constant drumbeat of criticism and public outrage, which has become so intense that officials decided to remove the American International Group name from the building where the firm is headquartered.

This fiasco begs many larger questions about our comfortable, albeit often misguided, way of life.

The sub-headline in a BusinessWeek article by Jack Welch, who used to run General Electric, and his wife, Suzy, summed up what defenders of capitalism usually have to say about this issue: “The free market may at times overcompensate. But there’s not a better system.” They acknowledged that “underperforming CEOs sometimes end up getting huge sums of money just to go
home.”

Then the couple went on to explain that some folks like Carly Fiorina, HP’s former head honcho, have generous severance deals (also known as “golden parachutes”) built into their employment contract as an incentive to sign on, while Chuck Prince and Stan O’Neal left Citigroup and Merrill Lynch, respectively, with stock grants and compensation earned during happier times. “Such endings look wrong and quite understandably give critics a platform,” they wrote before launching their defense, lamenting the rising tide of political correctness on this issue and decrying the mere thought of government involvement.

Give me a break!

The business imperative associated with executive compensation means there’s a certain price to pay for attracting and retaining a superstar in the corner office. Fair enough. I don’t have a problem with CEOs being paid well for exemplary performance, though God forbid they should be allowed to fly away in a golden parachute after not meeting earnings targets or burnishing shareholder value. It’s the American way and cornerstone of a free-market economy, which, in theory, is a smart and noble way to work, but when put into practice, it can be a messy proposition.

To me, there’s clearly a moral imperative that trumps this thinking, especially during the nation’s worst financial crisis since the Great Depression. The question is, how much pay is enough to live on comfortably without arrogance and disregard for one’s underlings? Is it $3 million? Is it $50 million? Is it $1.5 billion? I have a close friend in Portland, Oregon, who can stretch a greenback like nobody’s business and manages to live fully and happily on just dollars a day.

So-called variable pay packages that reward performance and encourage employee ownership once held great promise but were overshadowed by questionable executive comp packages and golden parachutes. Other factors have included stock-option backdating scandals, as well as so-called underwater pricing following the dot-com bubble burst and lopsided 401(k) plans that were overloaded with company stock (Enron and WorldCom produced two of the most frightening cautionary tales).

The trouble is that a growing concentration of wealth means a greater gulf between occupants of the corner office and average working Americans. There has been a sixfold increase in CEO pay among the Fortune 500 since 1980, and depending on the source, chief executives are said to have earned anywhere from 179 to 369 times the pay of an average worker.

Even if the most conservative estimate were accepted as the gospel on this issue, you’d be hard pressed to find many, if any, true believers who could argue that this disturbing phenomenon stands for anything more than greed and an embarrassing concentration of wealth.

One economist suggested that the earnings gap between the elite and middle class in the U.S. is twice as much as in the U.K. and three times France, which is a whole other argument. It’s no wonder so many of us have to deal with the “ugly” American stereotype abroad.

As a result of this hot-button issue, Uncle Sam and corporate-governance proponents have kept a much more watchful eye on incentive pay packages to help keep executives in line and save employees from themselves. Although well-intentioned, the danger is that too much oversight can serve to choke off business innovation. So we have to be careful about the delicate balancing act between preserving capitalism and creeping too far afield toward socialism, as conservative commentators fear.

I’d like to see a return to the days when hope was in the air about employees being able to share in the spoils in an increasingly competitive global economy. I’d also like to see more corporate chieftains willing to make sacrifices for the good of team and lead by example. Some of the more notable cases in recent years include:

* Robert Shillman of Cognex, who stopped taking a salary in April 2001 and bonus in 2004.

* Robert Miller of Delphi Corp., who cut his annual salary to just $1 after asking for cuts of up to 40% from hourly workers.

* Doug Parker of US Airways, who declined a $770,000 bonus in deference to employees who endured their share of painful cutbacks.

* Susan Lyne of Martha Stewart Living Omnimedia, who asked her board to salt away $200,000 of a $625,500 cash bonus in 2005 as seed money for an employee bonus pool.

* John Mackey of Whole Foods, who despite his recent troubles, has presided over a culture that sought to cap the executive pay ratio at 14 times the average worker’s pay.

I’m not suggesting a Marxist-inspired redistribution of wealth nor begrudging CEOs for banking well-earned dollars – just a rethinking of Capitalist zeal to ease the system’s extremes, correct any perceived imbalances and aspire to true pay-for-performance packages. There’s just no escaping this moral imperative and the time to act is now.
0 Comments



Leave a Reply.

    Archives

    January 2023
    September 2022
    August 2022
    May 2022
    February 2022
    January 2022
    October 2021
    July 2021
    June 2021
    May 2021
    February 2021
    January 2021
    November 2020
    August 2020
    July 2020
    April 2020
    March 2020
    January 2020
    November 2019
    September 2019
    July 2019
    May 2019
    February 2019
    January 2019
    November 2018
    August 2018
    May 2018
    March 2018
    November 2017
    September 2017
    July 2017
    March 2017
    February 2017
    December 2016
    October 2016
    June 2016
    May 2016
    December 2015
    October 2015
    September 2015
    August 2015
    May 2015
    February 2015
    January 2015
    November 2014
    October 2014
    March 2014
    January 2014
    December 2013
    October 2013
    July 2013
    May 2013
    December 2012
    August 2012
    June 2012
    May 2012
    February 2012
    December 2011
    July 2011
    February 2011
    October 2010
    January 2010
    October 2009
    June 2009
    May 2009
    February 2009
    December 2008
    September 2008
    April 2008
    January 2008
    November 2007
    September 2007
    July 2007
    April 2007
    January 2007
    December 2006
    September 2006
    May 2006

    Categories

    All

    RSS Feed

Powered by Create your own unique website with customizable templates.
  • HOME
  • Bio
  • CLIENT LIST
  • WRITING SAMPLES
  • BLOG
  • CONTACT